This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Health & Fitness

Let's Debate the Facts

Based on current events and the last debate on Foreign Policy, I make a case against Obama and his Administration in support of Mitt Rommney for President.

In the 10/22 debate on Foreign Policy, we watched Mitt Romney demonstrate once again that he is a true leader with exceptional analytical ability and deep understanding of the challenges we face internationally.  Conversely, Obama showed us that ...he is rude and would rather attack Mitt than discuss the facts.  I kept thinking, does he really believe himself?  If his foreign policy is so successful, why is the world such a mess?  And why are Ambassador Chris Stevens and three of his colleagues dead?

President Obama also must think that we are either amnesiacs or stupid.  I heard him apologize to the world numerous times for America.  I heard him say that America is no more exceptional than Greece.   He has not pursued the policies he claimed regarding the attack and murder of our Ambassador and 3 colleagues in Libya.  (In fact, the latest reports now say that he and his national security team watched the entire seven hour Benghazi attack LIVE on video taken by a drone above!  Not only did he do nothing to save our ambassador and his 3 colleagues, apparently Obama went to bed during the attack, got up in the morning and flew to Las Vegas and Colorado for fundraisers!)  How could he not send American jets from Italy (under three hours away flying time) to stop the attack? 

He believes his own talking points but I do not, I believe what I see and hear myself. I watched his UN speech when he blamed and referred to the obscure video 6 times, did not mention terrorism and said" The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam!"  What did the Ameican President mean by that?  Why did he not stand in front of the world and declare then that terrorists cannot attack America and get away with it? Why did he not say then that we would find and punish those who attacked our embassy and killed our ambassador?  How can any American President not set as a goal the elimination of the scourge of Islamist Terrorism?  At least say it!!!

Find out what's happening in Greenwichwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Obama may have been to Israel 4 years ago as a candidate, but he has not been there since though he has travelled to the Middle East numerous times.  and he has the worst relationship with Israel's leaders of any President that I have observed.  And guess what!  Mitt has also been to Yad Vashem and to Sderot.  MITT HAS SAID THAT WHEN HE IS PRESIDENT, HIS FIRST TRIP ABROAD WILL BE TO ISRAEL!   For Obama to criticize Mitt for travelling to Israel with some of his donors, was a low blow considering the time Obama spends with his donors!  (Beyonce, Jay-Z, George Clooney, Sarah Jessica Parker, Anna Wintour...need I say more?)   And guess what Mr. President, Mitt's donors are citizens and voters too! If you have any doubt about Mitt's committment and depth of feeling for Israel, watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2o531sms7A&feature=plcp

On Monday night, Mitt displayed for Americans to see that he is a natural leader and a gentleman.  He did not respond blow for blow to Obama's attempts to distract from the issues because it was unnecessary.  Obama cannot truthfully discuss the issues nor his policies because they are all disasterous for him.  He can only mount snarky, mendacious attacks on Mitt, but as Mitt said, "Attacking me is not an agenda!"

Find out what's happening in Greenwichwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

And if you think Obama has handled the situation in Libya properly, I suggest that you read this article:
 

First, Aid the Living

By Bing West   NATIONAL REVIEW October 22, 2012

A U.S. ambassador is missing and his diplomatic team is desperately fighting off terrorist attacks. Our commander-in-chief and his national-security team in Washington are listening to the phone calls from the Americans under attack and watching real-time video from a drone circling overhead. Yet the U.S. military sends no aid. Why?

On September 11, at about 10 p.m. Libyan time (4 p.m. in Washington), Ambassador Chris Stevens and a small staff were inside our consulate in Benghazi when terrorists attacked. The consulate staff immediately contacted Washington and our embassy in Tripoli. The White House, the Pentagon, the State Department, and numerous military headquarters monitored the entire battle in real time via the phone calls from Benghazi and video from a drone overhead.

Our diplomats fought for seven hours without any aid from outside the country. Four Americans died while the Obama national-security team and our military passively watched and listened. The administration is being criticized for ignoring security needs before the attack, while the CIA falsely attributed the assault to an imaginary mob enraged by a YouTube video. But the most severe failure has gone unnoticed: namely, a failure to aid the living.

By 4:30 p.m. Washington time, the consulate building was on fire and Ambassador Stevens was missing. In response, the embassy in Tripoli launched an aircraft carrying six American and 16 Afghan security guards. Benghazi was 400 miles away.

At 5 p.m., President Obama met with Vice President Biden and Secretary of Defense Panetta in the Oval Office. The U.S. military base in Sigonella, Sicily, was 480 miles away from Benghazi. Stationed at Sigonella were Special Operations Forces, transport aircraft, and attack aircraft — a much more formidable force than 22 men from the embassy. 

In the past, presidents have taken immediate actions to protect Americans. In 1984, President Reagan ordered U.S. pilots to force an airliner carrying terrorists to land at Sigonella. Reagan acted inside a 90-minute window while the aircraft with the terrorists was in the air. The Obama national-security team had seven hours in which to move forces from Sigonella to Benghazi. 

Fighter jets could have been at Benghazi in an hour; the commandos inside three hours. If the attackers were a mob, as the CIA wrongly speculated, then an F18 in afterburner, roaring like a lion, would unnerve them. This procedure was applied often in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Conversely, if the attackers were terrorists, then the U.S. commandos would eliminate them. But no forces were dispatched from Sigonella. 

In the meantime, the terrorists - untrained and poorly led by American standards - were proving to be lethal. They forced the Americans to abandon the Benghazi consulate, with the ambassador still missing, and fall back to an annex a mile away. When the terrorist gang followed the Americans, looters took the opportunity to ransack the empty consulate. But when they found Ambassador Stevens unconscious on the floor, they stopped looting and rushed him to a hospital. Unfortunately, the doctors could not save his life. Not knowing who he was, they took the cell phone from his pocket and called numbers. By about two in the morning, the American embassy received word that the ambassador was dead. 

About the same time, the 22 reinforcements from the embassy in Tripoli arrived at the Benghazi airport. They drove to the annex to assist in its defense against persistent terrorist attacks. Around 4 a.m. Libyan time — six hours into the fight — enemy mortar rounds killed two of the defenders on the roof of the annex. If even one F18 had been on station, it would have detected the location of the enemy fire and attacked. The fight - that began at 10 p.m. - persisted until dawn, when the Libyan militia came to the aid of the Americans.

 For our top leadership, with all the technological and military tools at their disposal, to have done nothing for seven hours was a joint civilian and military failure of initiative and nerve. Secretary of State Clinton has said the responsibility was hers. But there has been no assertion that the State Department overruled the Pentagon out of concern about the sovereignty of Libyan air space. Instead, it appears passive groupthink prevailed, with the assumption being that a spontaneous mob would quickly run out of steam. 

Firefights, however, wax and wane from dusk to dawn. You cannot predict ahead of time when they will stop. Therefore a combat commander will take immediate action, presuming reinforcements will be needed. 

The Administration wrongly blamed a mob for the attack. Yet ironically, Mr. Obama’s chances of reelection would have plummeted were it not for the human decency of a mob that took the ambassador to the hospital before the terrorists returned. If the terrorists had taken his body and, with no Special Operations Forces hot on their trail, taunted America the next day — claiming the ambassador was still alive — the Benghazi tragedy would have escalated into an international disaster.

Why did the National Security Council watch passively for seven hours while our ambassador and three other Americans died?

— A former assistant secretary of defense, Bing West is co-author of Into the Fire: a Firsthand Account of the Most Extraordinary Battle of the Afghanistan War

END OF ARTICLE, THIS IS NOW LEORA WRITING AGAIN:

This is shameful and disgraceful dereliction of duty by Obama, Panetta, Clinton, Brenner, the entire National Security Team.  Knowing this, I think that they and their "spokespuppets" like Susan Rice and James Carney should resign for deliberately deceiving the American People.  In no way do they deserve another four years of "misleading America from behind!"

VOTE FOR MITT ROMNEY FOR PRESIDENT!!! 



 





 

 

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?