.

Greenwich Considering Armed Guards at Public Schools

Town, school officials continue review of school security in wake of Sandy Hook school shootings.

 

The placement of armed security guards at Greenwich Public Schools is one of the options school and town officials are considering in the wake of last month's shooting massacre in Newtown in which 26 students and educators were killed.

In a letter to parents, Greenwich School Superintendent William McKersie wrote, "I continue to receive emails from parents and staff with suggestions for increased security, especially in regards to the merits of armed security guards at each school. (As many know, the Stamford Public Schools just added
unarmed security guards at every elementary school.)"

McKersie continued, "Adding armed guards at all schools, which some parents
have advocated, is a complicated step that presents many pros and cons, and may ultimately have minimal effects in the type of tragedies in Newtown and Columbine. Nevertheless, we will consider the option as we review our safety and security procedures relative to best practices in Connecticut and nationally."

Until a decision is made, McKersie said the Greenwich Police Department will continue to provide increased patrols in both marked and unmarked police vehicles in upcoming weeks. And fire and school lockdown drills previously scheduled for  mid-December have yet to be rescheduled.

In the days following the Newtown shootings, McKersie, Board of Education Chair Leslie Moriarty, First Selectman Peter Tesei and Police Chief James Heavey met to review school security. At the time Tesei said whether to assign School Resource Officers—uniformed Greenwich Police officers—to all public schools probably was not an option. Greenwich High School has one school resource officer who also is responsibile for the three middle schools as well.

However, security procedures and access to all schools is under scrutiny, officials have said.

One town official, Selectman Drew Marzullo is opposed to armed school security officers. In a letter to Moriarty and McKersie, Marzullo wrote, "While we can all agree that now is the time for a serious review of school safety, a needlessly reactionary response to a horrific crime does not make our town or our schoolchildren any safer. Instead, we should examine the current areas of weakness in our school safety plans, and use protocols, empirical evidence, and common sense to address those security gaps."

Marzullo also said, "Floating the idea of armed security guards in Greenwich schools should be taken off the table now, and should not  be part of the discourse that follows from the Sandy Hook tragedy. This should not be a public policy debate."

He added, "It is our job, as town government officials, to provide them with that security. However, introducing guns into their buildings, especially in the hands of non-law enforcement professionals, is essentially creating more opportunities for violence."

(To read Marzullo's full letter, please see the PDF at right.)

Hortense Crackerbush January 08, 2013 at 07:46 PM
Marzullo needs to wake up and get into the real world......our money is protected by two armed guards in an armoured truck when it is moved from bank to bank, what, our children and grandchildren in the schools are not worthy of the same protection in this day and age ??? .......typical liberal nonsense in my opinion !!!
SUV Sister January 08, 2013 at 08:43 PM
Yes but if the guards shoot the money by mistake, it doesn't bleed all over the floor and die.
OSR January 08, 2013 at 10:08 PM
So what's next, ARMED guards at Bus Stops, Playgrounds, Soccer practice .....
Mark Schultz January 08, 2013 at 11:16 PM
"Hortense" and "SUV Sister" your comments under these aliases are neither helpful or clever. You want armed guards with machine guns at GHS and all our schools? What else? Metal Detectors? Bulletproof glass? Teachers who go to the rifle range for staff development. You are both ridiculous.
Stan Kerns January 09, 2013 at 12:31 AM
Several things you might want to know--at Columbine in Colorado there were two uniformed, armed security men in the building when the shooting occurred. In Israel there have been armed (usually women) in the class rooms for years--you might want to study their model. The cost of a Policeman in every room (they are better paid than teachers) is past your resources. If you want to save lives by spending money you will save far, far more lives by buying dialysis machines. You can't simply "give the teachers guns"--but--were those interested to take the Federal Air Marshal Course during the summer (It already exists--includes phycological profiles--no air marshal has ever shot up a plane0 I would have no problem with such staff being armed--First Responders--and even armed guards in the building have proven useless. Stan
Enforcer Marc January 09, 2013 at 05:31 PM
We should arm the principals and custodians. Send them for tactical training.
Stan Kerns January 09, 2013 at 06:33 PM
Some would be suitable--some not. I would encourage you to take the time to study what Israel has done. They faced the same problem, except they were facing trained terrorist--not loons, and they have been successful. The training given Federal Air Marshals would pretty closely match the need. No need to reinvent the wheel. Stan
Vicki Camacho - Public Access Producer January 10, 2013 at 06:05 PM
I watched a high school spend so much money on metal detectors, armed and unarmed guards that the Board of Education no longer had money for after school programs, school trips, the arts, horticultural classes, video production, vocational training or school buses. There's no more guns in that high school except the arm guards. Sad right

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »